By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.
Laura,
on CREXONT since 2024
Immediate-release granules
Extended-release pellets
*In a clinical pharmacology study, the duration of levodopa levels was defined by how long the levels of CREXONT, RYTARY, and IR CD/LD were maintained in the blood above half the maximum concentration.
†This was a post hoc analysis of a secondary measure in the clinical pharmacology study; CREXONT vs RYTARY P=0.010; CREXONT vs IR CD/LD P<0.0001.
More “Good On” time
MAIN MEASUREMENT
compared with IR CD/LD
‡“Good On” time is defined as “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia. Change in “Good On” time was measured by comparing values at the end of study to baseline; P=0.019 vs IR CD/LD.
§This was the average dose frequency during the double-blind maintenance period.
SECONDARY MEASUREMENT
compared with IR CD/LD
||This was a secondary endpoint of the study.
¶Study end=Week 20 or early termination; P=0.025 vs IR CD/LD.
A DIFFERENT ANALYSIS OF THE SAME STUDY
compared with IR CD/LD
#“Good On” time is defined as “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia.
**This was a post hoc analysis of the study; P<0.0001 vs IR CD/LD.
MAIN MEASUREMENT
30 mins more “Good On” time with less frequent dosing‡§
‡“Good On” time is defined as “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia. Change in “Good On” time was measured by comparing values at the end of study to baseline; P=0.019 vs IR CD/LD.
§This was the average dose frequency during the double-blind maintenance period.
SECONDARY MEASUREMENT
30 mins less “Off” time per day||¶
People who took CREXONT had 30 minutes less “Off” time per day compared with those who took IR CD/LD
||This was a secondary endpoint of the study.
¶Study end=Week 20 or early termination; P=0.0252 vs IR CD/LD.
People who took CREXONT had 30 minutes less “Off” time per day compared with those who took IR CD/LD
A DIFFERENT ANALYSIS OF THE SAME STUDY
#“Good On” time is defined as “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia.
**This was a post hoc analysis of the study; P<0.0001 vs IR CD/LD.